<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Got Control?  Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.projectmechatronics.com/2008/05/08/got-control-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.projectmechatronics.com/2008/05/08/got-control-part-2/</link>
	<description>The synergistic application of interdisciplinary engineering fields.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Person</title>
		<link>http://www.projectmechatronics.com/2008/05/08/got-control-part-2/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Person</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.projectmechatronics.com/?p=30#comment-12</guid>
		<description>with the advent of fully functional pc's that are the same size or smaller then conventional plc's. it would seem that specialized plc's are no longer needed. i think its time for the industry to unite on one hardware platform to control the worlds factory's. mini pc's with 100 gig hard drives could store high speed data then send it to a server to collate  into a very usefull database. lets put an end to the seemingly hundreds of proprietary hardware and software. and standardize under one universal standard. that i think would certainly not be a waste of time!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with the advent of fully functional pc&#8217;s that are the same size or smaller then conventional plc&#8217;s. it would seem that specialized plc&#8217;s are no longer needed. i think its time for the industry to unite on one hardware platform to control the worlds factory&#8217;s. mini pc&#8217;s with 100 gig hard drives could store high speed data then send it to a server to collate  into a very usefull database. lets put an end to the seemingly hundreds of proprietary hardware and software. and standardize under one universal standard. that i think would certainly not be a waste of time!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Industrial PC</title>
		<link>http://www.projectmechatronics.com/2008/05/08/got-control-part-2/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Industrial PC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 11:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.projectmechatronics.com/?p=30#comment-13</guid>
		<description>"So maybe by looking at the controls world with an eye toward control system and data requirements as bandwidth propositions, we can construct better boundaries for applying the control system hardware that is available."

Hhhm, interesting thought. Thinking "outside the box" can be very productive but at the same time a waste of time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So maybe by looking at the controls world with an eye toward control system and data requirements as bandwidth propositions, we can construct better boundaries for applying the control system hardware that is available.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hhhm, interesting thought. Thinking &#8220;outside the box&#8221; can be very productive but at the same time a waste of time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
